Legal Opinion
State v. Espinoza
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 30, 2019No. 3D16-1860PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLindsey, J.
The State of Florida appeals the trial court's order granting Michell Espinoza's motion to dismiss the information charging him with three counts. In Count 1, the State charged Espinoza with unlawfully engaging in the business of a money transmitter and/or a payment instrument seller without being registered with the State of Florida in violation of section 560.125, Florida Statutes (2013), and, in Counts 2 and 3, with money laundering in violation of section 896.101, Florida Statutes (2014). The trial court erred in dismissing Count 1 because Espinoza acted as both a money transmitter and a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Forsythe v. Longboat Key Beach ErosionSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Seagrave v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Mendenhall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allstate Indemnity Company v. Gady Abramson, D.C., P.A., Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
- MICHAEL JOHN CRECELIUS v. MILDRED RIZZITANO, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF ROBERT ANTHONY ALVES, JR.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
- The State of Florida v. Daniel ArshadniaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023