Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Heckler

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 13, 1984No. Civ. A. 80-883-T, 83-0119-FPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TAURO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions contend that the Massachusetts Medicaid program’s six-month “spenddown” requirement for certain Medicaid applicants violates provisions of the Social Security Act and federal regulations. The case is before the court on plaintiffs’ motions for class certification and partial summary judgment and defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the plaintiffs’ motions are granted and the defendants’ motion is denied.

I

Background

Title XIX of the Social Security Act established the Medicaid program in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Schweiker v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Caldwell v. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. William Greklek v. Philip L. ToiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. Fabula v. BuckCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atkins v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. DeJesus v. PeralesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. George Hogan v. Margaret Heckler, Phillip JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  4. Dejesus v. PeralesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Rivera v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API