Legal Opinion

United States v. New Mexico

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1976No. 75-1103PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Chief Judge.

The United States brought this action seeking enforcement of the trust provisions of land grants of 100,000 acres made to New Mexico by Congress for “a miners’ hospital for disabled miners.” As representative beneficiaries, the district court allowed 28 individual New Mexico miners and the United Mine Workers of America to intervene. On a motion for summary judgment, the district court found that New Mexico was in breach of the trust provisions governing the land grants and ordered an accounting and compliance with the trust provisions. New Mexico appeals several aspects of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Lassen v. Arizona Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Alamo Land & Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Ervien v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jonson v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. Kadish v. Arizona State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. King v. LyonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  4. United States v. Seven Miscellaneous FirearmsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
  5. United States v. State Of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API