Legal Opinion

Kroh v. Rosenberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 8, 1930No. [No. 10, October Term, 1929.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

(Sloak, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

There is one bill of exceptions in this appeal, and that is to the action of the trial court in granting the- appellee’s two prayers and refusing the appellant’s first, second, third, and sixth prayers. The appellant’s first prayer is a request for an instructed verdict for the defendant (appellant), on the alleged legal insufficiency of the evidence to support a verdict for the plaintiff, and therefore makes necessary a consideration of the facts.

The only conceded fact is that the appellant placed a property known as the Elizabethan Apartments,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sussdorff v. . SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Lloyd v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Blake v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  4. Hill v. IglehartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  5. Lyon v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ricker v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Robert v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Washington Railway & Electric Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  4. Weinberg & Bush, Inc. v. MurrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
  5. Mayhew v. MeehanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API