Legal Opinion

Cooney v. Isaacks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 28, 1915No. 429PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Original petition for mandamus on the relation of P. Albert Cooney against S. J. Isaacks and another.

1Per curiam

This is a mandamus proceeding instituted in this court against Honorable S. J. Isaacks, judge of the Seventieth district court, of which district Reeves county is a part, Miss Willie De Woods, district clerk o.f said county, Pecos Valley State Bank, and John H. Morrow.

In a certain cause, pending in said court, entitled Van Deren et al. v. Cooney, No. 1293, a judgment has been rendered and entered in favor of interveners, the Bank and Morrow, against Cooney, in the sum of $15,876.83, with foreclosure of lien on realty. The judgment entered shows that it was a judgment by default. The petition…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wells v. LittlefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Eddleman v. McGlatheryTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Haley v. GatewoodTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. McKean v. ZillerTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Weaver v. VandervanterTexas Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Freedman Packing Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Moore v. McLennan CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. McPhail v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Fitzgerald v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Motor Inv. Co. v. KillmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API