Miller v. Klingman

Griffith, J.,

deliA^ered the opinion of the court.

There was a contract between appellant and appellees for the cotton season of 1926-27 to the effect that appellant would buv cotton for appellees, and that appellees would re-sell the same along with other cotton to be sold by the latter, and that the profits on the cotton procured by appellant would be equally divided. On May 25, 1927, following the close of the season,' appellees sent appellant a statement of the account between them, and at the same time a letter that “If there is anything that you do not understand we shall be very glad to…