Carlson v. Libby
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
The parties in this case are in dispute as to what right, if any, the plaintiff has to the use of a railroad siding which is owned by the defendant and extends in part over the plaintiff’s land. The finding, in which no changes may be made, discloses that the controversy arises out of a deed given by Cheney Brothers to Valvoline Oil Company on April 16, 1921. At that time Valvoline Oil Company owned property in Manchester which abutted property of Cheney Brothers on the east. The land of both was bounded on the south by the right of way of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Whalen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Chappell v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Lydick v. B. & O. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
- Dick v. Sears-Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brown v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Murphey v. GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Clean Corp. v. FostonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Walters v. SporerNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.