Legal Opinion
Dick v. Sears-Roebuck & Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 17, 1932PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff owned certain premises in Danbury upon which was a building built especially for and peculiarly adapted to the conduct of a retail furniture business. For several years subsequent to 1900 he conducted such a business in the building as an individual, but thereafter it was conducted by a partnership which consisted of himself, his wife and his son, but in which he held the greatest interest. While it was so being conducted he conveyed a lot of land across the street to certain grantees by a deed in which was inserted the following covenant: “The grantees herein, by the acceptance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Samuel Stores, Inc. v. AbramsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Bauby v. KrasowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Styles v. LyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Brett v. CooneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Bradford Realty Corporation v. BeetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Elida, Inc. v. Harmor Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Davidson Bros. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Genovese Drug Stores, Inc. v. Connecticut Packing Company, Inc., and Fotomat CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Calabrese v. McHughDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- New Haven Tobacco Co. v. PerrelliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.