Legal Opinion

Oakes v. Hattabaugh

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1994No. 10A05-9307-CV-263PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

This action arose out of a dispute over an easement for a common driveway. Appellant-plaintiffs Paulette and Garland Oakes, III, sought reimbursement of costs to maintain the common driveway from appellee-defendant Roberta Kent. Kent filed a counterclaim seeking an injunction for the Oakes' violation of restrictive covenants. Appellee-intervenor Big Ten Development Co. intervened claiming an interest in the same casement.

FACTS

In 1978, Big Ten purchased over 375 acres in Clark County from Utica Farms. At that time, Walter and Hazel Bales and Alvord and Zelma Pitts jointly owned…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. RittenhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Wischmeyer v. FinchIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Moseley v. BishopIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Irwin R. Evens & Son, Inc. v. Board of the Indianapolis Airport AuthorityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Brademas v. HartwigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Platt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Grandview Lot Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. HarmonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Hornsilver Circle, Ltd. v. TropeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Larry Mayes Sales, Inc. v. HSI, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. MacKiewicz v. MetzgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API