Mattapan Medical v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtCurtin, J.
This is a G.L.c. 90, §34M action to recover Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) payments for medical services provided by the plaintiff to defendant Jean Pierre Gladimy who was injured while a passenger in a vehicle insured by defendant Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (“Metropolitan”). Summary judgment was entered for Metropolitan, and the plaintiff has appealed pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8A.
The plaintiff filed two small claims actions against Gladimy and Metropolitan3 which were transferred to the regular civil docket on Metropolitan’s motion, and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Madsen v. ErwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Tetrault v. MahoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Miller v. MooneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 402 Rindge Corp. v. Ming TsaoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Knight v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
- Cruickshank v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004