Legal Opinion

Whitchurch v. Doughty

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1928No. 18678PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The parties to this cause will be referred to according to their relative positions in the trial court.

The plaintiff, Lloyd Doughty, sued the defendants Clifton G. Whitchurch and Dora Mae Whitchurch to recover on their two-year promissory note of $1,500, then one year overdue, and to foreclose a real estate mortgage given in security thereof, subject to a prior mortgage of $2,000 with accrued interest and certain accrued taxes.

The petition was in the usual form. After intermediate pleadings, defendant by answer admitted execution of the note and mortgage sued on, and for further answer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Dickinson-Reed-Randerson Co. v. MarkleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Lawton Mill & Elevator Co. v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Keller v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reece v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. Streets v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. McGuire v. Oklahoma City Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API