Legal Opinion

Dickinson-Reed-Randerson Co. v. Markley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 19, 1926No. 16060PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This suit was instituted in the district court of Wagoner county by plaintiff in error Dickinson-Reed-Randerson C< mpany, as plaintiff, against Arthur Pittman et al., defendants, to- recover judgment on two certain promissory notes for $120 each, and to foreclose a certain mortgage securing the payment of said notes executed by the said Arthur Pittman to the plaintiff, covering 80 acres of land, upon which there was an additional mortgage securing $1,200. Upon the trial of the case judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for the amount sued for, and foreclosing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morrison v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Sparks v. City Nat. Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. McLain Land & Investment Co. v. Swofford Bros. Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  4. Proctor v. FarnamNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  5. Archer v. . ArcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Garner v. Tulsa Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Graybill v. ClancySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. First State Bank of Taos v. WheatcroftNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Whitchurch v. DoughtyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Whitchurch v. DoughtySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API