Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Concord Volkswagen, Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 19, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TAYLOR, Judge.

Plaintiff Joyce A. Harmon [J. Harmon, or plaintiff] seeks compensatory damages, punitive and treble damages and attorney’s fees for losses resulting from the purchase of a 1985 new Plymouth Horizon automobile [car] on September 5, 1985. Although the plaintiff returned the car to the manufacturer’s dealer for repair many times, the problems were not corrected. On one occasion plaintiff Ronald Harmon [R. Harmon] was injured in an accident which resulted from the car stalling. The complaint invokes various statutes enacted for the protection of consumers. This motion focuses…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. King v. King Motor Co. of Fort LauderdaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Lamont v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008
  3. Singer v. Land Rover North America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API