Legal Opinion
180S, Inc. v. Gordini U.S.A., Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 10, 2009No. Civil JFM 08-0177PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs 180s, Inc. and 180s, LLC (collectively “180s”) bring suit for patent and trade dress infringement against Defendant Gordini U.S.A., Inc. (“Gordini”). Gordini asserts three counterclaims, two of which 180s has moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 180s seeks to dismiss Gordini’s counterclaims alleging intentional interference with contract and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. 1 (Pis.’ Mot. to Dismiss 1.)
The issues have been fully briefed and no hearing is deemed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Burbach Broadcasting Company of Delaware v. Elkins Radio Corporation Cat Radio IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Kenneth M. Zeran v. America Online, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Weigel v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Bhari Information Technology System Private Ltd. v. SriramDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- UIRC-GSA Holdings Inc. v. William Blair & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Roberson v. Ginnie Mae Remic Trust 2010 H01District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.