Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Salaried Employees Ass'n v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 62-672PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, District Judge.

In this civil action tried non-jury, plaintiffs seek to compel defendant to arbitrate a dispute between the union and the defendant with respect to the claimed right of the defendant to “subcontract” or “contract out” work which defendant’s regular employees generally perform. The issue involves the interpretation of the bargaining agreement. The evidence introduced at the trial is based largely on admissions from the pleadings, but as supplemented by one witness for the plaintiffs and two for the defendant. The following facts are supported by the evidence and are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 89 v. Riss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morrisville Borough Police Ass'n v. Morrisville Mayor & Town Council, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1977
  2. Lodge No. 912 v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API