Legal Opinion

Lodge No. 912 v. General Electric Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 5, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 5161Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN W. PECK, District Judge.

This action has been instituted under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185, by the plaintiff labor union which represents various employees of the defendant corporation. It seeks to compel the defendant to arbitrate Grievance No. 3-RPI-1563-IV filed in October, 1960, by an employee (Pangborn) during the term of a collective bargaining agreement executed between the parties in 1960 and which expired in 1963.

The parties agree that the question as to the arbitrability of this dispute is a question of law for the Court to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. In the Matter of James B. Carey, as President of International Union of Electrical Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. The Procter & Gamble Independent Union of Port Ivory, N. Y. v. The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Local No. 4377 v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API