Murray v. Firemen's Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
The principal error relied upon by defendant is the admission in evidence of a lace cover and lace tablecloth. These articles were made in Syria, where the wife of the plaintiff was bom. The two articles introduced over the objection of defendant belonged to the mother-in-law of plaintiff. The wife of plaintiff testified as a witness that the two articles, .the cover and tablecloth belonging to her mother, were duplicates of the two articles owned by plaintiff and destroyed by the fire. The two articles so destroyed were given to plaintiff’s wife by her mother. Upon that showing and for the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Walker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- McClung v. McPhersonOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Barnum v. LockhartOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Massie v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Bloch v. American InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Schweigert v. Beneficial Standard Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- New York Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Arthur L. Lee and Florence Grusenmeyer, Formerly Florence LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Dockins v. State Farm InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. ClaypoolOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Dolan v. Continental Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.