Legal Opinion

Cropp v. Interstate Distributor Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 10, 1994No. 92-1255-L3; CA A79549PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*512De MUNIZ, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action against defendants seeking money damages for personal injuries and property damage that they sustained when a truck, owned by defendant Interstate Distributor Company (Interstate) and operated by defendant Rust, collided with their parked truck in California. Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment that their action was barred by California’s one-year statute of limitations. We affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hein v. Taco Bell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  4. Long v. StormsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Spirit Partners, LP v. Stoel Rives LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Fields v. Legacy Health SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Pulido v. United Parcel Service General Services Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1998
  4. Frosty v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1995
  5. In Re the Marriage of DicksonColorado Court of Appeals · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API