McNeil v. Bean
Supreme Court of Vermont
Scire eacias upon a recognizance by the defendant to tbe plaintiff for costs in a suit in favor of the plaintiff against William and Willard Leland, which was appealed from before a justice by said Belauds. The facts in the case are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAmdis, J.
The plaintiff sued William and Willard Leland in an action of trespass, and attached a horse belonging to one of the defendants. The suit was originally brought before a justice of the peace, but was appealed to the county court. While pending there this defendant was recognized to the plaintiff in one hundred dollars for costs of prosecution, and the present action is scire facias upon that recognizance. The original case was finally decided in the supreme court, the plaintiff recovering three dollars and seventeen cents damages and seventy-six dollars and thirty-two cents costs, for which…
2Cited by6 opinions
- City of San Antonio v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Long v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- J. I. Case Plow Works v. Union Iron WorksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Templeton v. Capital Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1904
- Flynn v. EdwardsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.