Templeton v. Capital Savings Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
General Assumpsit by an- officer to recover his' fees. Plea, the general issue. Trial by court at the September Term, 1902, Washington County, Watson, J., presiding.. Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted.
Read the full summary
General Assumpsit by an- officer to recover his' fees. Plea, the general issue. Trial by court at the September Term, 1902, Washington County, Watson, J., presiding.. Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The items in dispute are the following: Cash paid for feeding six horses, attached at Calais.. $4.00- Cash paid for keeping six horses 67 days at 50 cents per day for each horse................................ 201.00 Officer’s services securing property at Groton......... 5.00 In respect of these items the court found that subsequent to1 the making of the attachment, and after…
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
The plaintiff, a deputy sheriff, sues to-recover his fees and charges for serving the writ and securing andl keeping attached property in a suit brought by the Savings Bank, defendant herein. The officer received the writ, from the attorney for the bank, and attached some horses on it by lodging a copy in the clerk’s office. After the writ was-returned and docketed, he took the property into his possession in pursuance of instructions given him by the attorney. The horses were afterwards demanded by the holders of two-chattel mortgages; and the attorney examined these claims, and thereupon…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carlisle v. Estate of SouleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1872
- Felker v. EmersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843
- McNeil v. BeanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
- Felker v. EmersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1844
- Dean v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1840
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co. v. LanyonConnecticut Superior Court · 1949