Legal Opinion
Leech v. Gaetz
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided November 20, 1973No. File 148778PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.
The plaintiffs have instituted a mandamus action to compel the issuance of a certificate of approval for their subdivision for failure to act within the sixty-five-day limit provided for in § 8-26 of the General Statutes. The portion of that statute as amended by Public Acts 1971, No. 862, § 9, which is pertinent to this case reads: “The [planning] commission shall approve, modify and approve, or disapprove any subdivision application or maps and plans submitted therewith within sixty-five days after the public hearing thereon or, if no public hearing is held, within sixty-five days after the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Forest Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Finn v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Bassett v. AtwaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Lahiff v. Saint Joseph's Total Abstinence & Benevolent SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Metropolitan Homes, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- M & L HOMES, INC. v. Zoning & Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Kelly v. City of BethanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Fedus Sons v. Zoning Bd. of Colchester, No. 09 45 45 (Apr. 16, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991