Holt v. Town of Stonington
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellee Carol Holt (“Holt”) filed this diversity suit seeking equitable relief to prevent defendant-appellant Town of Stonington, Connecticut (the “Town” or “Stonington”), from denying her the ability to build on a lot of land that she owns in the Town. The district court (Hall, C.J.) granted Holt an injunction to this effect following a bench trial. Under Connecticut law, however, a plaintiff must first exhaust available and adequate administrative remedies before she may receive judicial relief in a zoning dispute. On appeal to this Court, the Town argued in its reply brief that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Town of SterlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Hunt v. PriorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Simko v. ErvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- O & G Industries, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Housing Authority v. PapandreaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Porsch v. LLR, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Togut v. Forever 21, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Adames v. TajuDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Guterman v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Goral v. DartAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.