Legal Opinion

Holt v. Town of Stonington

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 29, 2014No. 12-4878-cvPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellee Carol Holt (“Holt”) filed this diversity suit seeking equitable relief to prevent defendant-appellant Town of Stonington, Connecticut (the “Town” or “Stonington”), from denying her the ability to build on a lot of land that she owns in the Town. The district court (Hall, C.J.) granted Holt an injunction to this effect following a bench trial. Under Connecticut law, however, a plaintiff must first exhaust available and adequate administrative remedies before she may receive judicial relief in a zoning dispute. On appeal to this Court, the Town argued in its reply brief that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Town of SterlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Hunt v. PriorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Simko v. ErvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. O & G Industries, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Housing Authority v. PapandreaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Porsch v. LLR, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Togut v. Forever 21, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Adames v. TajuDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  4. Guterman v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Goral v. DartAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API