Legal Opinion

Lang v. Rickmers

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1888No. 2548PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before the Hon. W. H. Stewart.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

A. Rickmers was indebted to his wife in the sum of two thousand four hundred dollars. As to this there is no controversy. On December 31,1886, he made-a contract to sell to A. & H. Kleinecke a stock of goods he then owned, for which they were to execute notes to Mrs. Rickmers—one for six hundred dollars, payable February 1, 1887, and' the other for the balance, payable January 1, 1888. The goods-were to be sold at seventy-five per cent of their original cost. The purpose in having the notes executed to Mrs. Rickmers was to secure and pay to her a part of the sum due…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. MinorCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1838
  2. Miller v. StevensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Van Duzor v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Armour v. PeckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Valley Stockyards Company v. KinselTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Berlowitz v. StandleyTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Marcus v. ArmerTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Malone v. DawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Parma v. First Nat. Bank of CameronTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API