Legal Opinion

Janda v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1998No. A-97-180Published

1Opinion of the Court

Inbody, Judge.

Michael Janda brought this action against the City of Omaha (City) pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 through 219 (1994), alleging he was entitled to overtime wages for work performed in 1993, 1994, and 1995. The Douglas County District Court awarded Janda back overtime wages for 1994 and 1995, plus taxable court costs and attorney fees. The City appeals, and Janda cross-appeals. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part, and in part reverse and remand with directions.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

Although the district court did not make a detailed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Falk v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Marshall v. BrunnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API