Legal Opinion

Benson v. Morgan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1883PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Newaygo. (Fuller, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Marston J.

The plaintiff: brought an action of assumpsit against the defendants for work and labor performed by her in a hotel. She declared generally upon the common counts and gave evidence of a special agreement under which she was to receive one dollar per day. At the time the agreement was made, and while the services were being *79performed, her husband, it was claimed, was interested with the other defendants, and that this claim, if any ever existed, was, in a settlement made between plaintiff’s husband and his co-defendants, taken into consideration and paid.

All of the material questions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mason v. DunbarMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Hubbell v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Moore v. FooteMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. SinghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  3. People v. HamacherMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Coles v. HarschOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Cowles v. Cowles' EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API