Benson v. Morgan
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Newaygo. (Fuller, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Marston J.
The plaintiff: brought an action of assumpsit against the defendants for work and labor performed by her in a hotel. She declared generally upon the common counts and gave evidence of a special agreement under which she was to receive one dollar per day. At the time the agreement was made, and while the services were being *79performed, her husband, it was claimed, was interested with the other defendants, and that this claim, if any ever existed, was, in a settlement made between plaintiff’s husband and his co-defendants, taken into consideration and paid.
All of the material questions…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mason v. DunbarMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Hubbell v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Moore v. FooteMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. SinghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
- People v. HamacherMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Coles v. HarschOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Cowles v. Cowles' EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.