Pollution Denim & Co. v. Pollution Clothing Co.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
AUDREY B. COLLINS, District Judge.
On August 10, 2007, plaintiff Pollution Denim & Co. commenced this trademark infringement action against Pollution Clothing Co., its president Jordan Wunder (collectively, “defendants”), and certain retailer and fictitious defendants. On the same day, plaintiff moved for and received a temporary restraining order and order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue. Plaintiff contends that defendants’…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon, Incorporated Max Shayne, Incorporated v. Alpha of Virginia, Incorporated, D/B/A Lone Star GrillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Sierra On-Line, Inc. v. Phoenix Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Foster Poultry Farms v. Alkar-Rapidpak-MP Equipment, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Hanginout, Inc. v. Google, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Aecom Energy & Constr., Inc. v. RipleyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Optimal Pets, Inc. v. Nutri-Vet, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012