Legal Opinion

People v. Mohr

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1938No. Crim. 3008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

Pound guilty by a jury of the offenses set forth in sections 288 and 278 of the Penal Code, the defendant appeals from the judgment as well as from the order denying a motion for a new trial.

Briefly, it appears from the record that on the morning of April 9, 1937, one Dolores, a girl four years of age, was attending her younger sister and was playing with other children in front of the family home at Thirty-seventh Street and Maple Avenue in the city of Los Angeles. Her eight-year-old brother, Leonard, was also present. About 9:45 A. M. Leonard discovered Dolores leaving in an automobile; she…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WisecarverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. State v. CazierUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Azbill v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. CazierUtah Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API