Legal Opinion

State v. Dockery

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 9, 1991No. 1 CA-CR 89-1459PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

In this appeal, the defendant, Timothy Dockery, argues that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw the guilty plea he entered pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970). The basis for the defendant’s request is that after entering his plea, but before sentencing, he discovered that he would probably die from acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) before his sentence was served. We hold that the trial court should have allowed the defendant to withdraw his plea.

The defendant was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. CorveloArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. ChavezArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. City Court of City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BacaColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Washington v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. State v. SalinasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. State v. DockeryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. State v. EllevanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API