Legal Opinion

Anabell's Ice Cream Corp. v. Town of Glocester

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided April 4, 1996No. CA 95-0265MLPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LISI, District Judge.

This matter is before this court on the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs, the Anabell’s Ice Cream Corporation and its owner and operators, Juliette and Louis Lopez, seek injunc- tive relief precluding the enforcement of an ordinance enacted by the defendant, the Town of Gloeester, as well as a declaratory judgment that the ordinance violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The ordinance prohibits the use of electronic noisemaldng devices by…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carlow v. MrukDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2006
  2. Howard Opera House Associates v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2001
  3. Howard Opera House Assoc. v. Urban OutfittersDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API