Legal Opinion

Carlow v. Mruk

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided March 28, 2006No. Civ.A. 04-325SPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SMITH, District Judge.

The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David L. Martin filed on March 10, 2006, in the above-captioned matter is accepted pursuant to Title 28 United States Code § 636(b)(1). Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

MARTIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the court are Plaintiffs [sic] Motion for Summary Judgment (Document (“Doc.”) #15) (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”) and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 17) (“Defendants’ Motion”)…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Larsen v. Fort Wayne Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
  2. Palmore v. City of PacificDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010
  3. Afjeh v. Village of Ottawa HillsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
  4. Bruce Kenyon; Frank Andrade; and Timothy Scanlon v. U.S. Department of Justice; U.S. Office of Justice Programs; and Assistant A.G. Brent J. CohenDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2026
  5. Hils v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API