Carlow v. Mruk
District Court, D. Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SMITH, District Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David L. Martin filed on March 10, 2006, in the above-captioned matter is accepted pursuant to Title 28 United States Code § 636(b)(1). Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
MARTIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court are Plaintiffs [sic] Motion for Summary Judgment (Document (“Doc.”) #15) (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”) and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 17) (“Defendants’ Motion”)…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Larsen v. Fort Wayne Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
- Palmore v. City of PacificDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010
- Afjeh v. Village of Ottawa HillsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Bruce Kenyon; Frank Andrade; and Timothy Scanlon v. U.S. Department of Justice; U.S. Office of Justice Programs; and Assistant A.G. Brent J. CohenDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2026
- Hils v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.