Ear v. Phnom Penh Restaurant, Inc., 88560 (6-21-2007)

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellant Phnom Penh Restaurant, Inc., et al. ("Phnom Penh") appeals the trial court's denial of its motion to vacate. Phnom Penh assigns the following errors for our review:

"I. The trial court abused its discretion when it denied defendant's motion to vacate."

"II. The trial court abused its discretion when it awarded plaintiff's damages."

{¶ 2} Having reviewed the record and pertinent law, we affirm the trial court's decision. The apposite facts follow.

{¶ 3} In July 2005, Appellees Doeun Chhan ("Chhan") and Dal Thach entered into negotiations with Mang Keo, the…