Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lindenschmidt v. Butler Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1995No. 1994-2385PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 464.] THE STATE EX REL. LINDENSCHMIDT, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF BUTLER COUNTY, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Lindenschmidt v. Butler Cty. Bd. of Commrs.,

1995-Ohio-49.] Civil procedure—Court of appeals, in a mandamus action, does not abuse its discretion in granting leave to file an answer after the twenty-eight-day period has expired, when—Court of appeals, in a mandamus action, does not err in granting a Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss, when. (No. 94-2385—Submitted May 9, 1995—Decided July 5,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Marion Production Credit Ass'n v. CochranOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Miller v. LintOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Rock v. CabralOhio Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ware v. Crawford (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Nat'l City Real Estate Servs. LLC v. Frazier, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Ross County2018
  3. Fourtounis v. VerginisOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Hover v. O'hara, Ca2006-06-077 (7-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Ihenacho v. Ohio Inst. of Photography & TechnologyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API