Legal Opinion
Bullen v. Chaffinch
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 17, 2004No. CIV.A.02-1315-JJFPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion Of Defendants For Judgment As A Matter Of Law Or, In the Alternative, For A New Trial (D.I.121-1, 121-2) filed by Defendants Colonel L. Aaron Chaffinch, James L. Ford, Jr. and the Division of State Police, Department of Safety and Homeland Security of the State of Delaware. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Defendants’ Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law on Plaintiffs’ claim that the Delaware State Police had reserved a certain fixed number, proportion or percentage of opportunities for promotion…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Callaway Golf Co. v. SlazengerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- McMillan v. Weeks Marine, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
- Espeed, Inc. v. Brokertec USA, L.L.C.District Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- Lentz v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Microchip Technology Incorporated v. Aptiv Services US LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.