Legal Opinion
Espeed, Inc. v. Brokertec USA, L.L.C.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 5, 2005No. Civ.A. 03-612-KAJPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
JORDAN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This patent infringement case was tried beginning on February 7, 2005. (Trial Transcript [“Tr.”], Volume [“Vol.”] 1.) Plaintiffs eSpeed Inc., Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P., CFPH, L.L.C., and eSpeed Government Securities, Inc. (collectively, “eS-peed”) accused Defendants BrokerTec USA, L.L.C., Garban, L.L.C., OM Technology AB, and OM Technology (US), Inc. (collectively, “BrokerTec”) of infringing claims 20-23 of U.S. Patent No. 6,560,-580B1 (the “ ’580 patent”). (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 512; Tr., Vol. 1 at 191-92.) Brok-erTec counterclaimed for a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Nexus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Exela Pharma Sciences, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025