Legal Opinion
Woida v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 10, 1978No. 4-77 Civ. 443PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ALSOP, District Judge.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Cooperative Power Association (CPA) and United Power Association (UPA) are Minnesota cooperative associations. Both are engaged in the business of the generation and transmission of electric power to their respective members. CPA’s members are 19 rural electric cooperative distribution systems. CPA’s member cooperatives serve residential, agricultural and commercial users in west central and southern Minnesota. UPA’s members are 15 rural electric cooperative distribution systems. UPA’s member cooperatives serve residential,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,041 Sonesta International Hotels Corporation v. Wellington AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Arlington Coalition on Transportation v. John A. Volpe, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co., a Corporation v. Itt Continental Baking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., and the State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant v. Howard H. Callaway, as Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sutter Sensible Planning, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Barcelo v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1979
- State of Alaska v. CarterDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1978
- Fin & Feather Sport Shop, Inc. v. United States Treasury DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1979
- White Earth Band of Chippewa Indians v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.