Legal Opinion
State of Oregon v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1994No. B075538PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, Acting P. J.
In this petition for writ of mandate, the State of Oregon, Oregon State University, and Oregon Health Sciences University and Clinics challenge the trial court’s denial of their motion to quash (Code Civ. Proc., § 418.10) based on lack of “minimum contacts” and comity. Under the particular facts presented, we find personal jurisdiction over petitioners is warranted, and deny the petition.
Factual and Procedural Summary
While a student at Lynwood High School in California, Earnest Killum rose to national prominence as an outstanding basketball player. During his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nevada v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. PensingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Mary Jean Prejean v. Sonatrach, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Davis v. Baylor UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Serafini v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. ShearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Roman v. LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.