Legal Opinion

Zelinsky v. Howe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1931No. 23105. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

William Howe and two of his business associates went to southern Oregon in an automobile belonging to and driven by him. Walter Zelinsky accompanied them as a guest upon the invitation of Howe. Leaving Tacoma, they went to Portland the first day, and on the next day, at a sharp right-angle turn in the Pacific highway near Sutherlin, Oregon, Howe ran the automobile into a drainage ditch along the roadway, injuring each of the occupants of the car. The accident occurred shortly béfore noon March 29. Zelinsky, who was severely hurt, brought this action against Howe to recover damages alleged to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gough v. SmalleyWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nangle v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Taylor v. TaugWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Swengil v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Tyler v. TylerWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Meath v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API