Legal Opinion

Hoover Motor Express Co. v. Hammer

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1957PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

The question presented for determination is whether by virtue of the “-Joe Davis Act,” where a restricted certificate is issued upon the basis of proof of public convenience and necessity, the restriction is removed as a matter of law by dividing the certificate into two seg*272ments and subsequently reuniting tbe segments under common ownership. The Commission removed tbe restrictions and tbe Chancellor affirmed tbe action of tbe Commission.

It appears that on October 29, 1945, W. F. McMurry d/b/a McMurry Freight Line filed an application in Motor Carrier Docket No. 2657 with tbe Tennessee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cumberland Lodge, No. 8, Free & Accepted Masons v. Mayor of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Davidson County v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Austin v. SheltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lavin v. JordonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cynthia E.Yebuah v. Center For Urological Treatment, PLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Jodi McClay v. Airport Management Services, LLC - ConcurringTennessee Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Lavin v. JordonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State, ex rel v. XantusCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API