Legal Opinion

Jonathan Frame v. Theodore Huber E

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2010No. DA 09-0299PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice McGRATH

¶1 Hubers, Poole, Smith, Yetters, Racicots and Martinsens appeal from the District Court’s April 17,2009, order granting Frame’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that Frame has an easement by necessity across their lands, and denying all other motions for summary judgment. We reverse.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶2 The parties all own tracts of land that abut the Dearborn River. Frame’s lot abuts the River on the south bank and lies in Lewis & Clark County. The Huber and Poole lots abut each other and are on the opposite side of the Dearborn River from Frame’s lot, in Cascade County.1…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Montana Coalition for Stream Access, Inc. v. CurranMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Graham v. MacKMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kullick v. Skyline Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Allstate Insurance v. Wagner-EllsworthMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Loomis v. LuraskiMontana Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Yellowstone River, LLC v. Meriwether Land Fund I, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Davis v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Sharp v. DowneyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. JRN Holdings v. Dearborn MeadowsMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Apecella v. OvermanMontana Supreme Court · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API