Legal Opinion

Board of Selectmen v. Planning Board

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 10, 1978No. 78-022PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case we are asked to resolve the ostensible conflict between RSA 31:63-a (Supp. 1975) and RSA 31:63-b with RSA 36:8 (Supp. 1975), as amended, Act of July 15, 1977, ch. 532:1 [1977] N.H. Laws 674 [hereinafter RSA 36:8]. The Presiding Justice, Flynn, J., reserved and transferred four questions:

A. Whether the provisions of R.S.A. 36:8, as amended, preclude a planning board from accepting petitions for zoning amendments after the 90th day before the Annual Town Meeting.

B. Whether the provisions of R.S.A. 36:8 supersede the provisions of R.S.A. 31:63-b, and thus precluding all zoning…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  2. Ingersoll v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  4. Public Service Co. v. Lovejoy Granite Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  2. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England v. HeedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  3. Gazzola v. ClementsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. King v. SununuSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. In re DunlapSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API