Legal Opinion

United States v. Henthorn

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 26, 2017No. 15-1490PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge.

This case presents us with the difficult issue of whether a district court presiding over a murder trial abused its discretion in admitting evidence of prior, similar incidents, including whether the defendant killed his second wife in circumstances similar to those that led to the death of his first wife.

We affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting prior similar conduct. The. court fully explained, and we agree, that the evidence was properly admitted under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), was relevant, and was not substantially outweighed…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. WackerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Ronn Darnell SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. IsabellaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. State v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  3. United States v. MerrittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. MurryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API