Legal Opinion

Teepak, Inc. v. Learned

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1985No. 57,149PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This is an action wherein plaintiff Teepak, Inc., seeks recovery from defendant George R. Learned for moneys paid by Teepak to Carl and Violet Baise in settlement of an action brought by the Baises against Teepak in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Learned filed motions to dismiss the action and for summary judgment predicated upon two grounds — that the statute of limitations had run, and that, as a matter of law, Teepak had failed to state a valid cause of action against him. The district court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. KeillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Kennedy v. City of SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Albertson v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. Russell v. Community Hospital Association, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Puckett v. Mt. Carmel Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. Anderson v. SchefflerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. Mick v. ManiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. Kemper National P & C Companies v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Dodge City Implement, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API