Legal Opinion

Mick v. Mani

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1988No. 61,428PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This is a medical malpractice action in which plaintiff Douglas Mick claims damages arising from reconstructive surgery performed by defendant, Dr. Mani M. Mani. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of Dr. Mani on the basis that this action was barred by virtue of a verdict in a Rooks County trial in which Mick had sought recovery of damages against a different defendant which included the damages he claims against Dr. Mani in this action. Mick appeals from the entry of said summary judgment.

Douglas Mick was severely…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brown v. KeillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Albertson v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  3. Anderson v. SchefflerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. McAlister v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Eurich v. AlkireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Humes v. ClintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Gilger v. Lee Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Gust v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Mills v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. Hammig v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API