Levitt v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Dean Whipple, United States District Judge
Before the Court is the Defendant Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation’s (the “Defendant”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to the Statute of Limitations (the “Motion”). See Doc. 36 (Motion); Doc. 37 (Suggestions in Support). The Plaintiff Jo Levitt (the “Plaintiff’) filed suggestions in opposition (Doc. 42), and Defendant filed a reply brief (Doc. 50). As explained below, the Motion is GRANTED because Plaintiff failed to timely file this lawsuit.
I.1
Defendant developed, manufactured, and distributed the pharmaceutical drug Vioxx.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Clemons v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Clarice King v. Nashua Corporation and H.S. CrockerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jo Levitt v. Merck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Jo Levitt v. Merck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019