Legal Opinion
Hurd v. D. E. Goldsmith Chemical Metal Corp.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 27, 1980No. 17614PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEDEN, Justice.
Donovan S. Hurd appeals from a default judgment in a suit on a promissory note brought by D.E. Goldsmith Chemical and Metal Corp. Hurd challenges the sufficiency of service of process on him and the awarding of attorneys’ fees.
The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded for new trial.
Appellee filed suit against Hurd on May 17, 1979. A citation issued on May 21 was returned unexecuted. The appellee filed a motion, supported by an affidavit, for substituted service under Rule 106, Tex.R.Civ. Proc., and the trial judge signed an order that provided:. the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Whitney v. L & L REALTY CORPORATIONTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- Flynt v. City of KingsvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Grapevine Trucking, Inc. v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Kirkegaard v. First City National Bank of BinghamtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mylonas v. Texas Commerce Bank-WestwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Nueces County Housing Assistance, Inc. v. M & M Resources Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Brown v. Magnetic Media, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
- Maritime Services, Inc. v. Moller Steamship Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Exposition Apartments Co. v. BarbaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.