Legal Opinion
Kirkegaard v. First City National Bank of Binghamton
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 2, 1972No. 7407PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIES, Chief Justice.
First City National Bank of Bingham-ton, New York, sued appellant on a promissory note in the District Court of Bexar County on August 12, 1971. On October 14, 1971, Bank’s attorney mailed a motion for service under Rule 106 to the district judge enclosing an order. The unverified motion alleged:
“Now comes Plaintiff and would show that the Sheriff has been unable to serve the Defendant personally as she apparently is avoiding service of citation, that she is presently living at 7526 Alpine Valley, accepts telephone calls there and returns them, and is either the usual…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. Texas Discount CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Spencer v. Texas Factors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Eagle Life Insurance Company v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Franks v. MontandonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Garrels v. Wales Transportation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Parr v. First State Bank of San DiegoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Hurd v. D. E. Goldsmith Chemical Metal Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Henderson 66 Sales, Inc. v. HarvisonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.