DeMarchis v. D'AMICO
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ROWLEY, President Judge.
George D’Amico and his wife, Mary, (hereinafter “appellants”) have appealed from a final decree in equity which was entered in favor of Raymond and Irma DeMarchis (hereinafter “appellees”) following the trial of these actions, which were consolidated by the trial court. As stated in the trial court’s opinion, appellants and appellees “have come before this Court to resolve disputes arising over alleged partnership agreements concerning an automobile repair business and the real estate and buildings it occupies.” (Trial Court Opinion, 4/16/92, p. 1).
Appellants contend…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yohe v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Murphy & Slota v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Dudash v. DudashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Roberson v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Hercules v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Alpart v. General Land Partners, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Santoro v. MorseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Fenderson v. FendersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Sorg v. CunninghamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Horner v. HornerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.