Santoro v. Morse
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
McEWEN, President Judge Emeritus.
¶ 1 This appeal 1 has been taken by Paul Morse (hereinafter “appellant”), Cable Technologies International, Inc. (hereinafter “CTI”), and Cable Technologies of New York, Inc. (hereinafter “CTINY”), from a preliminary injunction entered on February 7, 2001 2 That injunction provided:
ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2000, after hearings on , 12/29/98; 12/30/98; 2/10/99; 2/11/99;, 3/23/99; 3/25/99; and conference on December 23, 1999, on Plaintiffs Request for Preliminary Injunction, and after review of the record as well as the parties briefs, findings of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- John G. Bryant Co. v. Sling Testing & Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Village at Camelback Property Owners Assn. Inc. v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Soja v. Factoryville Sportsmen's ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Yohe v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- York Group, Inc. v. Yorktowne Caskets, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Kessler v. BroderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Brayman Construction Corp. v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Walter v. StacySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Porter v. Chevron Appalachia, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.