Legal Opinion

Manta Management Corp. v. City of San Bernardino

California Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2008No. S144492PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

Under federal law, “[l]ocal governing bodies . . . can be sued directly under [title 42, United States Code,] § 1983 for monetary . . . relief where ... the action that is alleged to be unconstitutional implements or executes a policy statement, ordinance, regulation, or decision officially adopted and promulgated by that body’s officers.” (Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Services (1978) 436 U.S. 658, 690 [56 L.Ed.2d 611, 98 S.Ct. 2018], fn. omitted (Monell).)

Here, Manta Management Corporation (Manta) seeks monetary damages against the City of San Bernardino (the city)…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McAllister v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. The LUCKMAN PARTNERSHIP, INC. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Marriage of Melum CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API