King v. Seals
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Chancery Court of Bullock. Heard before Hon. B. B. McCraw. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
This is a suit in equity for tbe foreclosure of a mortgage. The bill is in the usual form. Tbe cause was submitted to the chancellor on tbe bill, exhibits, answer, demurrer, plea, and proofs. On the hearing, tbe chancellor overruled tbe demurrer, and decreed a foreclosure of the mortgage by sale unless tbe money due on the *417promissory note secured in the mortgage was paid in the time specified in the decree. The defendant, King, in the circuit court below, appeals to this court, and here assigns the overruling of his demurrer and the decree of the chancellor as error.
The pleadings and proofs…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- State v. MarlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
- Graham v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- De Jarnette v. De JarnetteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
- Bierne v. The Steam Boat TriumphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Silverstein v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Adler v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Barclay v. PlantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
- Wise v. NortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
- Chitwood v. Cromwell & SharpTennessee Supreme Court · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.